The Role of Telemedicine in Improving Patient Outcomes : A Comprehensive Review
Keywords:
Telemedicine, Patient, Outcomes, Healthcare, AccessibilityAbstract
Telemedicine has emerged as a transformative approach in healthcare delivery, enabling remote diagnosis, treatment, and patient monitoring. This comprehensive review aims to evaluate the role of telemedicine in improving patient outcomes across various medical fields. The study analyzes existing literature to identify the benefits and challenges of telemedicine implementation. The findings indicate that telemedicine enhances patient accessibility to healthcare services, reduces waiting times, and increases patient satisfaction. Moreover, it facilitates continuous monitoring of chronic conditions, leading to improved health outcomes. However, challenges such as technology adoption barriers, data security concerns, and regulatory issues persist. This review highlights the necessity for strategic policies and infrastructure development to maximize the potential of telemedicine. The implications of these findings suggest that integrating telemedicine into conventional healthcare systems can significantly enhance patient care and overall health system efficiency.
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). (2024). Telehealth interventions and patient outcomes: Technical brief.
Albahri, A. S., Hamid, R. A., Alwan, J. K., Zaidan, A. A., Albahri, O. S., Zaidan, B. B., & Alamoodi, A. H. (2023). The role of telemedicine in improving healthcare outcome: A review. ResearchGate.
Bashi, N., Karunanithi, M., Fatehi, F., Ding, H., & Walters, D. (2021). Remote monitoring of patients with chronic disease: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(9), e25195.
Binghamton University. (2024). COVID-19 pandemic and telemedicine: Impact on patient care. Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Cochrane Library. (2024). Systematic reviews in health care: A practical guide.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. Sage Publications.
Kidholm, K., Ekeland, A. G., Jensen, L. K., Rasmussen, J., Pedersen, C. D., Bowes, A., Flottorp, S. A., & Bech, M. (2012). A model for assessment of telemedicine applications: MAST. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 28(1), 44-51.
Kruse, C. S., Karem, P., Shifflett, K., Vegi, L., Ravi, K., & Brooks, M. (2018). Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 24(1), 4-12.
Langarizadeh, M., Moghbeli, F., & Aliabadi, A. (2023). Telemedicine: A key solution for healthcare access in remote areas. European Journal of Internal Medicine.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100.
Martínez-Pérez, B., De La Torre-Díez, I., & López-Coronado, M. (2024). Telemedicine in healthcare systems: Long-term impact analysis. Journal of Advanced Research.
Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., & Becker, M. H. (1988). Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Education Quarterly, 15(2), 175-183.
Smith, T., & Marshall, L. (2024). Challenges in telemedicine adoption: Technological and security concerns. Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Telehealth and Medicine Today. (2024). Meta-analysis on mortality risk reduction through telehealth monitoring in heart failure patients.
Totten, A. M., Hansen, R. N., Wagner, J., Stillman, L., & Iyengar, S. (2024). Long-term impact of telemedicine on healthcare systems: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research.
